Which of the following actions could lead to a written official warning?

Committing an act of official misconduct is clearly a significant breach of ethical and legal standards expected of a notary public. This action undermines the integrity of the notarial process and may lead to serious consequences, including a written official warning. Such misconduct can involve actions like fraud, neglect of duty, or any behavior that violates the laws governing notarial acts. In this context, a written official warning serves as a formal reprimand, signaling that the behavior is unacceptable and that further misconduct may lead to more severe penalties, including potential revocation of notary commissions.

Other actions, such as inactivity for a period of time or receiving a positive review, do not generally trigger warnings because they reflect either a lack of engagement or successful performance, respectively. Similarly, passing a re-evaluation test indicates compliance and competence rather than misconduct. Therefore, the emphasis on misconduct as the basis for a warning highlights the importance of maintaining ethical standards in notarial practices.