Once the signer directs someone to sign on their behalf, you should ask the disabled person which of the following?

When a signer directs someone to sign on their behalf, it is essential to ensure that the signer understands and acknowledges the act of signing as well as the implications of that signature. Asking if the disabled person acknowledges that the document is signed voluntarily serves several important purposes.

Firstly, it confirms that the signer is aware that the signing is occurring and has given their consent for someone else to act on their behalf. This is vital in maintaining the integrity of the notarization process, as the notary must ensure that the signer is not being coerced or signing under duress. Furthermore, this acknowledgment solidifies the understanding that the signer respects the contents and the purpose of the document being signed, which contributes to its legality and binding nature.

In contrast, questions about needing assistance or readiness to sign may not address the critical legal aspect of voluntary acknowledgment of the signing process, which is an essential component for the notary's responsibility to verify the authenticity and voluntariness of the transaction. Similarly, asking if the signer agrees with the contents might not capture their awareness of the voluntary act of signing itself, which is what the focus should be on in this scenario. Therefore, the correct approach revolves around confirming the signer's awareness and voluntary participation in the signing process.